PDA

View Full Version : Spears' Baby Pictures Stolen


Noah
10-23-2005, 11:58 AM
<img src="http://www.fanbolt.com/forums/images/avatars/Music/av_britneyspears6.jpg" width="84" height="84" vspace="5" hspace="5" align="left" border="0" alt="Britney">So, apparently, some baby pictures featuring Britney, Kevin and their son were stolen, published online and shortly after taken down due to threats from spears.

The 23-year-old "singer" said that the publication of the pictures would be an invasion of the family’s privacy. Spear’s record label, Jive Records, said in a statement, “Anyone who publishes, sells or otherwise exploits any of these images in any way will be subject to liability and damages for willful infringement of copyright.”

Hmm, I give it MAYBE another week before Britney and Fed-head are pimping out baby pictures to every publication from here to Siberia. After their train-wreck of a Television "show" I find any claim to her family's "privacy" quite comical.

celebfan2005
10-23-2005, 12:06 PM
oh no thats a shame for the baby poor baby butt the person that stole the pics and gave them to the people that posted them prob got alot alot of money

Faith
10-23-2005, 12:13 PM
I think she is daft saying that after making a TV show about her life, but at the same time I get her not wanting pictures of her baby plastered all over the net. It's a mothers instinct...

celebfan2005
10-23-2005, 12:15 PM
yeagh its a shame for the baby :(

tantucky
10-23-2005, 01:04 PM
She's so dumb. K-Fed really rubs off on her.

Fading Shadow
10-23-2005, 01:11 PM
She's gotten really stupid after marrying K-Fed and I did hear that she was having a crew tape the birth of her baby so they can air the birth on Britney & Kevin:Chaotic which I think is really lame.

Kari
10-23-2005, 01:42 PM
:lol: So they stole the baby pictures. Duh, she will really, really hate the publicity she gets for that, considering she is so shy when it comes to exposing herself in the media and forcing her private life on everybody.

Faith
10-23-2005, 02:18 PM
It's not right for her to bring her kid into the public eye... The child should be old enough to make the decision itself as to whether it wants that or not, not like the Beckhams kids, who were just thrust out there for all to see... She needs to be a mother right now, not a celebrity.

Krazy
10-23-2005, 02:44 PM
I don't understand why Britney is upset i mean okay pictures of her baby were put on the net but is that so bad? We all know by the time the baby knows how to walk, it would have taken and been in millions of pictures already. We all know she's not going to keep her baby out of the spotlight, i mean Kevin enjoys the attention enough and he'd want his child to enjoy it too.

Fading Shadow
10-23-2005, 03:07 PM
Did she really think this wasn't going to happen? I mean it happens to every celebrity it had to be expected.

Faith
10-23-2005, 03:38 PM
Still though, with all the paedo's and stuff, I would take out some kind of order to try stop any pictures of my kid being taken and published... She is being a complete hypocrite though, she brought the baby into the public eye!

Mrs Adam Brody
10-24-2005, 07:38 AM
Quick Question has Brit already had the baby & was it a Boy?

Krazy
10-24-2005, 09:08 AM
Britney had her kid like a month ago and it was a boy, i think it was called Sean Preston or something.

seth_is_my_baby
10-27-2005, 07:46 AM
Britney is pathetic. I mean, come on, if she was willing to record the birth of her baby for her television show, then what is the difference if photo's are stolen?

Fading Shadow
11-02-2005, 08:29 PM
I wonder if she knows there is pictures of her her mom and her baby in an couple months old issue of InTouch magazine.

GoodbyeAngel
11-03-2005, 04:15 PM
i saw a few teeny tiny pics of those originals on a site, before brit went a-wall and told eveyone to take them off
Sean actually looked pretty cute, as far as i could tell ;)

Lucky_Ducky
11-12-2005, 06:09 PM
I'm not really surprised they were stolen, she was going to sell them anyway.