posted by
FanBolt on
11.13.2009 - 08:52:49 am.

2012
In the grand tradition of movies named after years, ("2001," "1941," "10,000 B.C.") comes Roland Emmerich's new piece of cinematic fluff, "2012." No where near the quality of disaster picture he was producing fifteen years ago, Emmerich has served up a half-baked, bloated, boilerplate picture that mines the deepest caves of cinema cliches, and tosses them up on screen in the most predictable succession. By the end of its ridiculously long run time I was no longer sure if "2012" referred to the year in which the film takes place, or the number of minutes I had been fettered to my seat.
Emmerich and co-writer Harald Kloser quickly glaze over the cause of the world destroying disaster. Whether it was the rare planetary alignment as Charlie Frost (Woody Harrelson playing a character not too far from his true self), the hippy conspiracy theorist says, or the massive solar flares, a plot device already used earlier this year in Alex Proyas' "Knowing," it is never clear. But whatever it is it ruins John Cusack's camping trip to Yellowstone with his kids. Then the world blows up, the everywhere floods, and the rich elite crowd onto massive submarine/cruise ships called "Arks."
Continue reading 2012 Review: Not A Bang, But A Whimper..